Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Show & Tell thread.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    You're avoiding the obvious detail that you have no details.

    Comment


      #32
      You seem to still want me to clarify what you are attempting to elucidate...how's that working out for you and Cunty?

      Comment


        #33
        Do you have any evidence or not? If as I suspect that latter is involved, why waste your time trying to claim you know what you are not talking about?

        Comment


          #34
          Do you have any evidence or not? If as I suspect that latter is involved, why waste your time trying to claim you know what you are not talking about?
          You claimed you had 63 examples where Donald Trump sued to overturn elections, and you haven't even cited one. CW even made it extremely easy for you to do so.

          But, with all of those claims you have made for weeks, that leaves you with 1 stunning conclusion that you have been fighting us tooth and nail for a guy you completely hate and claim cheated in 2016:

          An election under domald J. Trump and mike pence was one of the fairest and most secure election in the history of the united states. Are you willing to stop sucking your own hate-on and admit that Trump ran a fair election?

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Sasquatch View Post
            Oh that is blatantly obvious. He/she/it asked all of these questions, and yet when I point the bitchtits to the answer and let him/her/it use his/her/it's own sources to go into detail on who is suing and what do they want in each case, bitchtits defaults back to some diatribe just to avoid answering his own questions by giving even the most rudimentary look at the said cases. He's crying about semantics like what's a plantiff and then scream the infamous "I don't care" line.

            Almost like he/she/it doesn't want the answers, but just wants to do exactly what you just said.

            Remember, hthe meme is that Trump sued 63 times and lost, not that there were 63 cases challing the validity of some aspects of the election.

            Like this one for instance:



            Where's Trump on this?

            or how about this one:

            Is shitscrape going to come back and tell me the fucking state of Texas and Donald Trump are one in the same?

            He/she/it can go back and say "n..noooo! dats nawt dah pawt of dah seeeeexxxfree cawses", but then again, he/she/it won't even cite the 63 cases in question, so what is shitscrape trying to hide?
            Only his own insecurities. I'll lay you London to a brick Homo is one of those delightful individuals who sobbed inconsolably into his haggis November 2016 that Evil Golf Course Man had risen to more or less the top of the food chain while Homo's Sassenach Masters were busily depriving Scotland of the badly needed muscle he felt the EU might have provided. You have to understand, Homo is the kid at school who would have dearly loved to be the bully, but who lacked the basic muscle to make it stick and had to follow the actual school bully about, simping to their every requirement and laughing along with all of their crummy jokes. Pretty much most of Scotland is that pathetic, so you can imagine just how miserable they are having to live under England's boot heel.

            Thing is, misery loves company, so that's why he's here - to attempt to make his enemies feel miserable. He has identified us as such because we haven't spent the last five years hating on Donald Trump as he has all his life, therefore he figures there's an exploitable opportunity to get us all wailing as hard has he has been. Then and only then can he smile. The trouble with his reasoning is that neither you or I are soy-sucking SJWs and are therefore unlikely to go on a tantrum throwing exhibition when we don't get our own way. Speaking purely for myself here, I can see his self destructive behaviour and treat it for what it is - an example courteously set for how me not to behave. So this battle was lost, the USA is set to fall and take a large swathe of the world's economy down with it... so what? I for one accept that is where we are headed and have prepared for it in lieu of attempting to bludgeon morons like Homo to the table. The latter offers nothing to improve my own circumstance. And past providing Homo with a heaven sent opportunity to blister his own cock on the topic, it scarcely furthers his situation any either

            So shore up your own position and fortify it against the coming storm. I imagine you have a few reserves you can draw on for when times get tough(er); learn to husband your resources and share them only among those you can quantifiably prove will ultimately help you over the line. Remember, it's not socialism when there is an observable return for your investment. I'd also advise you become familiar with the concept of a "slam-bang" (which I'll link you to in PM). They used it extensively in the Phillippines against the Japanese in world war two and it occurs to me that in an era where the authoritarians are seeking to deprive the citizenry of any and all means to exercise their voice in the decision making process, easily created and destroyed methods of "persuasion" may yet become a useful arrow in ones quiver should circumstances find you needing to defend your hard won gains.


            Originally posted by Sasquatch View Post
            You claimed you had 63 examples where Donald Trump sued to overturn elections, and you haven't even cited one. CW even made it extremely easy for you to do so.

            But, with all of those claims you have made for weeks, that leaves you with 1 stunning conclusion that you have been fighting us tooth and nail for a guy you completely hate and claim cheated in 2016:

            An election under domald J. Trump and mike pence was one of the fairest and most secure election in the history of the united states. Are you willing to stop sucking your own hate-on and admit that Trump ran a fair election?
            I doubt he will. I caught an interview with Mark Chapman last night where he claimed Trump had cheated on the 2016 election, though the only comments he made supporting his claim was that Trump had secured the electoral college vote, but not the popular vote. Except anyone with even a basic understanding of the situation knows that in the constitutional republic we call the US of A, it's all about the electoral college and bugger all to do with the popular vote. That's just the way their constitution was written and their founding fathers saw fit to include the electoral college system after determining the popular vote system to be too open for abuse. Not that the electoral college cannot be gamed either, but at least it offers some semblance or representation for the "flyover states" they otherwise would not enjoy if the population centers (ie: New York, California etc) got to decide for all who got what slice of the pie.

            So with no other claim than "muh popular vote" (which as we've seen does not and can not reasonably apply anyway), I'm not seeing any avenue where Trump could have cheated in 2016. He was, quite literally, expected to lose and by a massive landslide and did not enjoy wide support otherwise, even among republicans. The Russia question was addressed and dare I say it, obsessively so for a good many years, ultimately being shelved due to an utter lack of evidence by people who were desperate to prove the collusion angle. This is in stark contrast to the election we have just witnessed where evidence apparently [i[does[/i] exist in the person of Chinese collusion, hacking of US governmental software, voter fraud, ballot stuffing,and other impropriety which has yet to be presented formally in any court of law and likely never will. Legacy and social media giants are likewise colluding with the incoming administration to stamp out any dissenting voices to their curated narrative, the Faustian deal has clearly been struck and only a lapdog or a fool would seek to portray this as desireable in any way.

            Vitty is correct; the world is going back to war. We should count ourselves fortunate that sixteen years of escalating conflicts was halted in 2016 and for our four years of reprieve in that regard, but it is over now. Time to yeild our sons and daughters up for the military industrial complex's whim. Unless of course if you are a US citizen on the right wing, in which case I understand our kindly and benevolent warmongers plan on taking them from you by force. Our rights are once again abrogated, we are free to do only as they tell us.

            That is their plan. In practice I doubt it will play out quite as easily. I've been hearing reports on the sly of many districts which have openly declared they plan on flouting US federal laws they disagree with, and with the example set by sanctuary cities and sanctuary states in recent years I see precious little avenue for the incoming administration to enforce its will where other, stronger administrations have failed to. The Bidet/Cumlover administration is effectively but a puppet of the oligarchs (and Mark Chapman recognised this too and reviled them for it even as he excoriated Trump) and the plain and simple truth is that even with full blown martial law and authoritarian crackdowns as has been hinted at, there are some 150 million voices in opposition to the paltry handful looking to exercise their dominance... and that number is growing.

            The US is fucked and the rest of the western world along with it. Yuri Bezmenov warned up of the communist plan decades ago, it is now being brought to fruition before our very eyes. Every empire has its heyday and the western empire is no exception. I'm not going to suggest that we will wake up tomorrow and find ourselves living the lives of poverty and hardship enjoyed by peasants in Tsarist Russia (much less the privations faced by those who came afterwards in the Soviet regime) but my my calculation we are headed for a dempression which conceivably could make the Weimar republic look like a walk in the park.

            And here's the kicker - it is going to ultimately lead to the arrival of a newly minted and more extreme fascist than we've witnessed previously, and it will be born in the ranks of the socialists. They're already rattling their sabers and making the same noises as the National Socialists were doing circa 1933... do you really think they are going to stop at simply taking your children from you for re-education?

            Comment


              #36
              Addendum: https://www.bitchute.com/video/vOERioHhXNen/


              Hey, it's got to be better than mooching about while Nancy Pelosi turns the rest of the US....



              Click image for larger version

Name:	sanfranshitsco.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	81.6 KB
ID:	11739


              ...into a carbon copy of her district's streets.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Sasquatch View Post
                You claimed you had 63 examples where Donald Trump sued to overturn elections, and you haven't even cited one. CW even made it extremely easy for you to do so.

                But, with all of those claims you have made for weeks, that leaves you with 1 stunning conclusion that you have been fighting us tooth and nail for a guy you completely hate and claim cheated in 2016:

                An election under domald J. Trump and mike pence was one of the fairest and most secure election in the history of the united states. Are you willing to stop sucking your own hate-on and admit that Trump ran a fair election?
                What a fabulous forum of flagrant failures we inhabit. Watching you two spunkholes try to come up with a photo-finish as to how fick you are and why you should be ignored, is apoplectically astounding.

                I don't need to cite anything, it's your show and tell. Show us where the Trump campaign won a court case where you were not allowed to present the evidence you had? You never presented any evidence, none, so why I am responsible for proving that you don't have what I already acknowledge you never did.

                I gave you a synopsis of everything you lost right up to SCOTUS, and you have given me... what? I simply ask for proof that the courts never heard and you prove your point by proving my point? You lost in court, unless you are saying that you won. You do realise that is categorised as a fucking delusion.

                I never once claimed that President WhatsHisName lost in 2016. Not once. I accepted it, it's a pity you cannot do the same in 2020. You are aware that the 2016 election was held under the federal auspices of the Obama - Biden administration, so how can it be that 2016 proves, "An election under domald J. Trump and mike pence was one of the fairest and most secure election in the history of the united states" - and you are equally aware I suppose, that all election's in a GE are run at state level and not a federal one. Please tell me you at least understand that. At the very least.

                Now this, this really does highlight using a radioactive glow in the dark sharpie just how intelligent your responses have become.

                It cheers me up to realise just how right I am about you Din, and your brother in harms.

                Comment


                  #38
                  I liked the bit where Cunthole called me a homo.


                  And the heavens fell.



                  Comment


                  • Filthmuck
                    Filthmuck commented
                    Editing a comment
                    They're tastier that YouTubes and come with less net-nannying and cautionary tales about what may or may not be true. Now available with 60% more buffering issues, thanks to the community-at-large's newfound discovery of same.

                    I could always link you to premium content instead, Something like https://uatv.infogalactic.com/video/...harder-1ba00b/ for example would be appropriate, especially in this thread.

                    I'm sure my efforts would be rewarded with as much assiduous attention to the actual content as the average US court demonstrates.

                  • cw_
                    cw_ commented
                    Editing a comment
                    heh I'll get around to fixing the bb code for bitchute at some point. I look forward to that day as much as you do.

                  • Filthmuck
                    Filthmuck commented
                    Editing a comment
                    Meh, not that I don't appreciate your effort but I'm thinking the inline video player for those links is somewhat of an exercise in futility to be honest. You have to figure that if people are not inclined to open a link in a second tab, there's no reason to expect they'd bother to click a play button in front of them, particularly if there was a chance it contained something that might hurt their feeliefeels. "I may make you feel, but I can't make you think"... so said one of Scotland's few non-Homos, through from his penchant for wearing fruity tights and codpieces and posing like a ballerina for flute solos it was kinda difficult to tell.

                  #39
                  I don't need to cite anything
                  And there's YOUR problem. You know that once you cite those 63 cases in question, then your entire goalpost-shifting escape hatch goes along with it, all because you cited less than reliable sources that "donald trump sued the government 63 times to overthrow the election" when you don't even know what cases you're even talking about.

                  Either cite the 63 cases in Question, or quit wasting my time with your low-information attention whoring.

                  Comment


                  • Blandscape
                    Blandscape commented
                    Editing a comment
                    Coming from someone who thinks the 2016 election was run and won under President WhatsHisNames' administration, and that the federal government that Trump wasn't even in charge of until 2017 was in charge of a 50 State state wide election in 2016, doesn't really bode well for your ability to construct a sentient thought, never mind call a result for a free and fair election in 2020.

                    You really are that fucking dumb

                    I fucking love that about you.

                  #40
                  Are you even more of a moron than even I gave you credit for. The court cases are lost. Every single one of them, so if they are lost, how do they in any way shape or form prove that you won????

                  Explain.

                  Comment


                    #41
                    Did you or did you not win in every appellant court in the gid ol'US of A Din.

                    It's a simple question with an even simpler answer.

                    Comment


                      #42
                      From the OP:

                      "It was obviously stolen? How? Let's hear this evidence that makes that a conclusion worth arriving at.

                      Show us how your election was surreptitiously stolen from you in plain site, and in a translucent tidal wave of your despair."

                      Demanding Blandy "cite" 60+ court cases that were rejected (sometimes by Trump-appointed judges) isn't just tangential, it's fucktarded. The whole purpose of the thread was for people to *provide* proof, not attempt to send Blandy on assorted bullshit snipe hunts.

                      Only pointing that out. As you were, gents...

                      Comment


                      • Filthmuck
                        Filthmuck commented
                        Editing a comment
                        Originally posted by Vitty View Post
                        From the OP:

                        "It was obviously stolen? How? Let's hear this evidence that makes that a conclusion worth arriving at.".
                        Already done. And Homo's avoided it utterly, pretty much like the US court system did.

                        I am not surprised, nor am I concerned. I knew going in that it was his game, I also know there is every chance that it will happen again and in all likelihood will ultimately happen at Homo's expense. And Homo will have no legitimate wriggle room for complaint when it does.

                        Not that that will stop him of course, I did say he was Benzover with a scottish accent and such he is. Like most latter day scots he's quite the little soycialist justice warrior. I suspect the only reason Superchud keeps him around is that Homo makes him look good by comparison.

                      #43
                      Let me give you a clue.

                      Not once in regard to election fraud. Not once.

                      Comment


                        #44
                        Originally posted by Vitty View Post
                        From the OP:

                        "It was obviously stolen? How? Let's hear this evidence that makes that a conclusion worth arriving at.

                        Show us how your election was surreptitiously stolen from you in plain site, and in a translucent tidal wave of your despair."

                        Demanding Blandy "cite" 60+ court cases that were rejected (sometimes by Trump-appointed judges) isn't just tangential, it's fucktarded. The whole purpose of the thread was for people to *provide* proof, not attempt to send Blandy on assorted bullshit snipe hunts.

                        Only pointing that out. As you were, gents...
                        Thank you V, I realise that we do not agree on this issue, but this is lunacy...truly.

                        Comment


                          #45
                          What we know is Din thinks Trump was in charge of an election in 2016.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X